今天基右們投白票,反基就用選票把立場反基的侯選人送入立法會!
『七一上街』反對網絡審查、思想監控、愚民政治 
週一, 六月 29, 2009, 10:21 AM - 無神論
各位7.1遊行參加者:

在7.1遊行中,本群組的「維護公民自主權,反對網絡廿三條」參與隊伍會於以下時間、地點集合:

時間:7月1日下午3時
地點:維園(中央圖書館方向出入口)

公民社會網絡
Alliber

明日的香港,會否是今日的中國?

隔岸觀火,我們旁觀綠壩肆虐中華,繼網絡長城(great firewall)和金盾之後,繼續以過濾色情訊為名,行政治審查之實。(*1)

而網絡審查的魅影,亦正在無聲無息中,意圖伸延到香港。

去年,香港政府提出《淫褻及不雅物品管制條例》諮詢文件,由蘇錦樑(民建聯前副主席、香港商務及經濟發展局副局長)操掌大旗。當中運用誤導手法欺騙公眾,例如以「澳洲、法國也強制ISP(互聯網供應商)提供過濾服務」為由,提出ISP層面的過濾建議。但這種說法完全違背事實,捏造論據。(*2)

今年,政府又公佈了一項誤導市民的民意調查,並希望透過這種充滿誤導性質的工具作為民意基礎,以求達到從嚴規限網絡資訊的目的,重施誤導之技倆。(*3)

缺德如此的政府,又如何「興禮樂之教」,反對「不良資訊」?不知明日香港,會否只許高官狗嗡,不許poor guy鳴冤?

昔有03年50萬人民反對廿三條,今有網絡廿三條潛伏於下半年的第二輪諮詢。

各位市民,希望你們能夠上街表達對彷如「代表香港市民論」的大家長主義管治的不滿,反對思想監控,反對愚民政治。

我們維護公民社會的網絡資訊,反對愚民社會的網絡廿三條。

七月一日,綠壩登陸華夏。七月一日,我們為中華的自由文化發聲。



*1: 綠壩受測試之後,發現其中的關鍵過濾字庫,只有約2700個詞彙與色情資訊有關,卻有多達約6500個詞彙屬政治審查

*2:莫乃光《淫褻條例諮詢誤導市民? 》:
http://charlesmok.blogspot.com/2008/12/blog-post.html

*3莫乃光《淫管條例民調反映討論未能聚焦》:
http://charlesmok.blogspot.com/2009/05/ ... st_18.html
發表回應   |  0 引用   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 73 )
SCMP(06/26/09): 達爾文的勝利 
週日, 六月 28, 2009, 05:08 PM - 轉載
香港教育署最近公開聲明神創論及智慧設計論不會成為中學生物科課程的一部份,香港科學教育關注組當然歡迎此一決定並視為一重大勝利,四位有份在二月的香港大學教授都曾發信要求香港中學生物科課程都要反映全球科學界否定神創論及智慧設計論的主流思想,包括科學系系主任國辛都異口同聲指責香港教育署九月生效的新課程指引其實是默許在中學生物科教授神創論及智慧設計論;但是香港科學教育關注組同時亦擔心在校本管理政策主導下單一份教育署聲明未必有太大的作用,因為部份公開承認在生物科教授神創論及智慧設計論的基督右派中學,如中華基督教會屬下的學校,可能會陽奉陰違。
這件事的緣起在香港教育署於九月生效的新課程中的生物科指引有一句如此的話: 除達爾文理論外,教育署豉勵學生進一步發掘及探索對生命起源的另類解釋及理論; 立法會在收到香港科學教育關注組的投訴後便召開了相關的會議,等待收到香港教育署的相關報告後才繼續辯論,然後便有64位人仕為在香港教育署於九月生效的新課程中的生物科指引包容了神創論及智慧設計論去信辯護。後來,立法會收到香港教育署的報告辯稱於九月生效的新課程「是為了加強學生對生物科科學的研究如何和當時的科技、社會及(政治?)環境掛勾」;該報告又聲稱在生物科中達爾文進化論中,教授的重點是達爾文進化論為目前科學界中最廣泛被接受的理論﹐我們期望學生能夠用達爾文進化論中的各慨念去解釋生物演化的方法及過程;學生應該明白達爾文進化論是由觀察及收集客觀數據、細心分析、提出可用驗證的假設和最後用實驗去決定假設的真偽,但是在同時生物科的理論及知識不是一成不變的,永恆為真的。所以除了達爾文進化論外,學生也可以去理解一下如 Jean-Baptiste Lamarck 及 Alfred Russel Wallace的演化理論,這些另類理論都是自然科學理論的研究範圍,當然不包括非自然科學的理論。
國辛教授對此回應,以為是香港教育署終於承認達爾文進化論為目前科學界中最廣泛被接受的理論,而神創論及智慧設計論根本不屬於現代生物科學的範疇。對生物科學生來說是有所得箸,因為這表明香港的生物科教育仍然保持和全球生物學的同一水平,是故最好香港教育署這份聲明要廣傳到每一位生物科教師中。
香港科學教育關注組創立人 Virginia(貓姐)表示香港教育署這份聲明其實仍有美中不足的地方,她說: 香港教育署這份聲明是向正確的方向走前關鍵的一步,因它不單詳述了科學方法的內涵及定義,而且還清浙指出神創論及智慧設計論根本不屬於現代生物科學的範疇,卻還未走到把神創論及智慧設計論這些國際公認的偽科學踢出自然科學的涵意外。所以香港科學教育關注組會繼續努力完成此目標: 令香港教育署接受神創論及智慧設計論等均屬偽科學。
同時,這64位為在容許生物科中教授神創論及智慧設計論而去信教育署指稱科學並無絕對的定義,共中40位是學者及7位為教師;但是它的發言人香港大學生物系教授Stephen Tsui Kwok-wing卻竟然這樣回應教育署一再聲明它拒絕把神創論及智慧設計論列入生物科教程: 他以為他們這封聯署信不是在提倡在生物科中教授神創論及智慧設計論,而他們也會理解和尊重香港教育署這份拒絕把神創論及智慧設計論列入生物科教程的聲明。而在64組當中的香港大學物理系副教授Chris Beling則這樣回應: 香港教育署的聲明對的地方不少,只不過當香港教育署居然可以完全接受千瘡百孔的達爾文進化論為生物科科學的最佳解釋則令他很費解。他以為用聖經作藍本的神創論當然是不可以在中學生物堂時教授,但不明白何以香港教育署一竹竿打潟一船人,把神創論及智慧設計論歸作同一類東西,因為他以為智慧設計論其實具備成為自然科學的一門的條件。既然香港是自由社會,所以指引歸指引,實行歸實行。
一位香港教育署女發言人如此回應﹐這拒絕把神創論及智慧設計論列入生物科教程的聲明並不是互相排斥,因此學校看指引要看「全套」: 聲明只是短短的一段﹐但九月生效的新高中課程指引卻共有138頁之多。
香港立法會教育委員會的何秀蘭主席以為香港教育署已恰如其份在後來的聲明的第五段公開聲明: 香港教育署完全拒絕把神創論及智慧設計論列入生物科教程。她希望這一件事到此暫告一段落,她不以為立法會教育委員會應該挑起一次神學界和科學界的大辯論。
發表回應   |  0 引用   |  permalink   |   ( 2.8 / 42 )
Victory for Darwin - Creationism rejected in new guidelines on the biology curriculum 
週日, 六月 28, 2009, 01:52 PM - 無神論

南華早報 | 2009-06-26
EDU1| EDU| By Liz Heron

The Education Bureau has announced that creationism and intelligent design will form no part of the senior secondary biology curriculum.

The move has been hailed as a victory by leading scientists at the University of Hong Kong, who in February called for curriculum guidance on evolution to be upgraded to reflect current scientific thinking.

The four scientists, who include dean of science Sun Kwok and science faculty board chairman David Dudgeon, accused the bureau of encouraging schools to promote creationism in biology lessons through the guidelines.

The Concern Group for Hong Kong Science Education, which is lobbying for changes to the guidelines, has also welcomed the paper but says it does not go far enough.

The calls were prompted by a clause in the biology guide, which comes into force in September, that states: "In addition to Darwin's theory, students are encouraged to explore other explanations for evolution and the origins of life."

The bureau's paper was drawn up for the Legislative Council's education panel, after the Concern Group called for a panel debate on the issue. The panel demanded a report from the bureau and postponed a decision on the debate. Last month, the row intensified when the "group of 64" mounted a counter-offensive calling for the clause to be retained.

The bureau's paper points out that the curriculum aims to strengthen students' understanding of scientific inquiry in biology and its links with technology, society and the environment.

"In the topic 'Evolution', the emphasis is put on Darwin's Theory, as it is currently the most widely accepted scientific theory on evolution," it states. "Students are expected to understand the process and mechanism of evolution based on Darwin's Theory. Students should recognise that biological knowledge and theories are developed through observations, hypotheses, experimentations and analyses and [be] aware of the dynamic nature of biological knowledge."

The paper also states: "In the biology curriculum framework, creationism or intelligent design, which was mentioned in the recent submissions to the Legislative Council panel on education concerning the biology curriculum, is not included. In addition to Darwin's Theory, students are encouraged to explore other explanations on evolution such as that of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Sir Alfred Russel Wallace." It stresses that non-scientific explanations are not included.

Professor Dudgeon said: "Th bureau has recognised that the Darwinian theory of evolution constitutes the core of modern biology and that intelligent design and creationism have no place in the modern science curriculum.

"It is a victory for the students and it will help to ensure that our science teaching remains world class. Clearly this guidance needs to be circulated to all secondary schools before the next semester."

Concern Group founder Virginia Yue Wai-sin, said the paper only partially met demands in its petition for action by the bureau. "It is moving in the right direction," she said. "They have excluded creationism and intelligent design from the curriculum and they also emphasise scientific methods in greater detail. Yet they have just failed to take the critical step of saying that intelligent design and creationism are not science. We will continue to pursue answers to these questions with the bureau."

The "group of 64", which includes 40 academics and seven teachers, argued that there was no universally accepted definition of science. But spokesman Stephen Tsui Kwok-wing, a molecular biologist at Chinese University, said yesterday: "We accept and respect the clarification of the biology curriculum guidelines from the Education Bureau. We reiterate that the purpose of our letter was not to promote the teaching of creationism or intelligent design in secondary schools."

However, "group of 64" member Chris Beling, an associate professor in HKU's physics department, said: "The EDB's response has many good points but its tacit approval of Darwin's theory, which has so many blatant errors, is not commendable.

"Understandably, Bible-based creationism is not to be taught as science, but it is regrettable that intelligent design is lumped in the same basket, seeing it has all the characteristics of good science. Fortunately, these are only guidelines and we live in a free society."

An Education Bureau spokeswoman said the paper was based on the 138-page biology curriculum and assessment guide for the new senior secondary curriculum and its interpretation demanded a "holistic" understanding of the guide.

Cyd Ho Sau-lan, chairwoman of Legco's education panel, said: "I find paragraph five enough to tell the stance of the administration. It says very clearly that intelligent design or creationism is not included."

She hoped the debate was now over. "I don't think the panel is in a position to engage itself in a debate between theologians and scientists. It could be an endless one," she said.
發表回應   |  0 引用   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 56 )
A call to arms for all Chinese Netizens 
週五, 六月 26, 2009, 10:28 PM - 獨立媒體
(Rather shot for standing up, never knee for survival!)
(Onward, global Netizens, it is your turn to change the course of human history and return dignity to every mankind!)

Hello,the Internet censorship/Thought Police division of Chinese Communist Party. We are a group of anonymous Netizens.We have been watching you on what you did to the China domain of Internet which is originally intended for free exchange of information: You block website and IP out of your temper and to your pleasure, you use advance technology to monitor the transaction of every bits and bytes, you use all medias for the sake of propaganda , you distort the perception of public opinion by employing so called 'Public Opinion Guidance'. All these is sealed in our mind. As your defamation against Google and force the installation of Greendam censorship software on all newly brought computer offer us irrefutable evidence of your intention to fully control every bits and bytes flowing in every computers of China. We therefore unanimously decided to launch a full scale attack on the State machinery responsible for limiting the freedom of Internet within China.

The is for protecting the feeble, despicable freedom left on the China domain of Internet, that is for the sake of guarding the progress of integration of human civilization with the Internet. We need to protect our inalienable right of information in the Internet,we are going to systematically ruining every electronic and organic component of the censorship appliance, just to demonstrate how feeble are you in front of the power of millions of infuriated Netizens , you are only no. 1 enemy of freedom. We would wage an ongoing warfare until you have exhaust every lies and means of deception. Mao's People warfare shall be adapted and will overwhelming the running dogs of Chinese communist Party. Your so-called slogan and old-fashion propaganda should no longer works on us. You are clueless toward the Internet and what it implies so you pretend that is for the sake of (your) future. The is the ringing of Death bell to you. You can't hide since we are everywhere, state-sanctioned violence can't rescue you. Whatever one of us is fallen, ten of other will join us; failure only make us grew stronger and resilient toward the Disease which is the State itself. We are all familiar with your common tactic against Chinese citizen: You would draw a line to separate us as the minority of minority from the general public, then label us criminally-insane just like how you treat dissidents of all kind. You isolate and attack one by one of us. That is an acceptable lose in face of total war against the People of China, we encourage you to react as fierce as you can. Since your cruel and irrational action speak volume compare to your voice. It only amounts to drop your pant before you rape everyone of us again and again while you can never achieve an orgasm.

As the human civilization continue to the develop in the rein with Internet,the fear of so-called ruling elite toward Internet streaming from an obsolete ideology toward the rising power of Netizen,your monitoring and blocking of China domain of Internet,all that only demonstrate your fear of the historical trend, and shall become the last fruitless struggle before you bury under the progressive force of Psychohistory. Those who want to turn the Earth backward in its orbit is destinate to be in the Trash can of history. Despite your suffocating vein is still replace by new supplement, the Internet is what beyond your capability of understanding. We may admire your never-changing fabrication of conspiracy theories against those who aware of the truth of China in Cultural Revolution style out of nostalgia ,we will joke at your attempt to make domain out of the boundless Internet since history would laugh at all stupidities. That is what we shall inform you in full honesty:

We have no interest in taking the failing political power of you,we are not interest in your fruitcake ideology nor power structure. You simply can't understand how humanity become an inseparable part of the Internet and how the history of old world just melt away. You simply can't understand how nationalism and racism dissolve in the era of Internet. You can't change your ignorance of the Internet, you regime can never compare to us, we are not friends nor enemies of any nations, the biggest enemy your face will be within every part of you. Your corruption and alienation have pave the way to grave for you. We are not interested to what shall be pass in the history as trash. You can't reverse the change implies by advent of Internet, which is what whole humanity is heading. Actually, we don't even mind that you pull the plug of the cable connecting China to world in the bottom of Pacific Ocean; The more you attempt to reverse the course of history, you merely create more contradictions within and outside yourself, you merely fan the fire of rebellions against your dictatorship everywhere, all your effort will only sum to the total alienation and annihilation . The sun shall rise and shine only those who are not afraid of tomorrow.

We are anonymous Netizen, we are the sum total of global Netizen, we are one but many. We shall dominate the Internet, we do not negotiate, we are uncountable, the failure of one of us merely implies many other become part of us. We are everywhere, we can do the impossible, we are irresistible, we don't have weakness but shall exploit every weakness of the State machinery. We are the humanity which beneath the mask of every Netizen, we are the mirror which entail humanity. We all born free and equal, we are legions, we don't forgive nor forget.

Let freedom rule the Internet!

Expect us, We shall be there.
發表回應 ( 1預覽 )   |  0 引用   |  permalink   |  related link   |   ( 3 / 46 )
轉載: 2009匿名網民宣言 
週四, 六月 25, 2009, 12:47 PM - Euler Original
(寧可站箸死,不可跪箸活;
生存本來沒有什麼,
死亡於我有何懼?)

你好,中國政府網絡審查部門。我們是匿名網民。長久以來,我們目視了你對互聯網的所作所為。你對互聯網言論自由的無端封鎖,你對互聯網先進技術的敵視,你勾結宣傳喉舌對事實真相的扭曲,你運用網絡評論員對網絡輿論的的毒化,這些都深深地刻印在我們的記憶中。隨著最近你綠壩強制安裝的通知和對谷歌的惡毒誹謗的出爐,你全面控制全面審查互聯網的險惡用心已經明白無誤地展現在人們面前。我們匿名網民於此決定,我們將從2009年 7月1日開始在全球範圍內對你所控制的網絡審查體系發起全面襲擊。

為了保衛互聯網的自由,為了推動人類網絡化的前進,同時也為了我們自己的網絡權利,我們將對你的網絡審查體系進行系統性破壞並展現你所謂網絡審查體系在真正網絡力量之前的渺小。我們將你視為網絡頭號公敵。我們對你發起的將是持久戰。無論你如何利用宣傳喉舌愚弄輿論,你終將湮沒在人民戰爭的汪洋大海之中。你古板的宣傳手段,你文革般陳舊口號式的叫囂,你對互聯網的無知,你“為了下一代”之類的虛偽說辭,這些都為你的徹底失敗敲響了喪鐘。你無處可逃,因為我們無處不在。國家暴力機器不能拯救你,因為我們每一個成員的倒下,都意味著另外十名新成員的加入。我們清楚地意識到你會運用你慣常的階級鬥爭伎倆,在你的蠱惑宣傳中賦予我們“不明真相群眾”的標簽在我們與普通民眾之間劃出界線,然後賦予我們“少數不法分子”的標簽在我們內部劃出界線,最終各個擊破。對我們來說,這是可以接受的。事實上,這是我們所鼓勵的。原因很簡單,你越這樣看待你的人民,你皇帝新裝的美麗就越不言自喻。

隨著人類網絡文明的發展,處於優勢地位的統治階級敵視網絡化的陳舊意識形態逐漸成為歷史發展進步的阻礙。舊意識形態勢力對新興網絡勢力的誣蔑和壓迫,對網絡世界的敵視和封鎖,這些都表明了他們對於歷史潮流的恐懼,都將成為他們在退出歷史舞台之前的最後掙扎。那些妄圖在歷史車輪面前螳臂擋車的,都將最終被掃進歷史的垃圾堆。即使你的血液正在得到數字移民的緩慢補充,你在可見的未來將仍然無法理解網絡。我們會欣賞你對於異己幾十年不變的陰謀論觀點和文革口號文風,因為我們也會有懷舊的心情;我們也將笑談你試圖在互聯網上劃出國界的舉動,因為愚蠢行為從來都是史書中的笑點。不過我們可以真誠地告訴你:

沒有人想要更迭你的政權,我們對你陳舊的政權概念和意識形態爛腌菜毫不感興趣。你無法理解在人類網絡化的歷史潮流之前宏大敘事為何而消解,你也無法理解國家和民族概念為何將分崩離析,你無法改變你對互聯網的無知。你的政權無法成為我們真正的敵人。我們不是任何國家和組織的朋友,我們也不是任何國家和組織的敵人。只有你是你自己最大的敵人,你正在為你自己掘下腐爛和異化的墳墓。我們對即將進入歷史垃圾堆的事物沒有興趣。網絡化是你無法阻擋的歷史潮流,是人類社會發展的未來方向。事實上,我們並不反對你通過切斷太平洋海底光纜而獲得對信息的絕對控制;你對歷史前進越阻礙、你造成的矛盾越深化、社會運動就越劇烈,倒退只能加速你被異化、被取代的歷史進程。明日的太陽不會照耀那些恐懼明天的人。

我們是匿名網民。我們是全球網民的總和。我們行為一體。我們是主宰網絡。我們不可計數。我們每個成員的倒下都意味著十名新成員的加入。我們無處不在。我們無所不能。我們不可阻擋。我們沒有弱點。我們利用一切弱點。我們是隱藏在每一張面具之下的人性。我們是人性的鏡子。我們生而平等。我們天然自由。我們是軍團。我們不饒恕。我們不忘記。

自由引導網絡。

我們即將到來。
發表回應   |  0 引用   |  permalink   |   ( 3 / 35 )

<< <前一頁 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 下一頁> >>